Within the presentations at Tech Day, AMD typically provides plenty of performance data from their own labs. The integrated graphics provide 512 streaming processors, identical to the $169 processors from previous generations, but this time upgraded with the Vega architecture. The suggested retail price of $99 means that this is the cheapest Ryzen desktop processor on the market, and it crosses a fantastic line for consumers: four high-performance x86 cores under the $100 mark. The rated frequencies, 3.5 GHz for base and 3.7 GHz for turbo, are slightly below that of the Ryzen 5 2400G but are still reasonably high – despite this chip being rated for 65W, the same as the Ryzen 5 2400G, users might expect this processor to turbo for longer within its power window as long as it is within its thermal boundaries (we do see this in some benchmarks in the review). The specifications follow the other Ryzen 3 processors already in the market: four cores, and no simultaneous multi-threading. The cheaper $99 processor is the Ryzen 3 2200G. In virtually all scenarios, even if a user does not use the Ryzen 5 2400G integrated graphics, the Ryzen 5 2400G seems the better option on paper. The 2400G has a higher set of frequencies (3.6G vs 3.2G base frequency, 3.9G vs 3.4G turbo frequency), higher memory support (DDR4-2933 vs DDR4-2666), no cross-CCX latency between sets of cores, but has less 元 cache per core (1 MB vs 2 MB). Both chips will continue to be sold, but at this price point AMD will be promoting the 2400G over the 1400. The Ryzen 5 2400G somewhat replaces the Ryat the $169 price point. (Yes, that means these chips are overclockable.) Aside from the full set of hardware, the CPU frequency of the 2400G is very high, similar to the standard Ryzen 7 desktop processors: a base frequency of 3.6 GHz and a turbo of 3.9 GHz will leave little room for overclocking. Maximum supported memory frequency will vary depending on how much memory is used and what type, but AMD lists DDR4-2933 as the support for one single-sided module per channel. The integrated graphics frequency will default to 1250 MHz and the total chip TDP is 65W. The 11 compute units for the 2400G translates as 704 streaming processors, compared to 640 SPs on the Ryzen 7 2700U or 512 SPs on previous generation desktop APUs: an effective automatic 25% increase from generation to generation of desktop APU without factoring the Vega architecture or the frequency improvements. This is one compute unit more than the Ryzen 7 2700U Mobile processor, which only has 10 compute units but is limited to 15W TDP. The Ryzen 5 2400G has a full complement of four cores with simultaneous multi-threading, and a full set of 11 compute units on the integrated graphics. AMD has stated that at this time no Ryzen 7 equivalent is planned. Most of the following analysis in this section was taken from our initial APU Ryzen article.ĭespite the Ryzen 5 2400G being classified as a ‘Ryzen 5’, the specifications of the chip are pretty much the peak specifications that the silicon is expected to offer. Both parts are distinguishable from the non-integrated graphics Ryzen processors with the ‘G’, which is similar to how Intel is marketing its own Vega-enabled processors. The two APUs that AMD is launching today are the Ryzen 5 2400G, a $169 14nm quad-core Zen processor with simultaneous multithreading and ‘Vega 11’ graphics, and the Ryzen 3 2200G, a $99 14nm quad-core Zen processor without simultaneous multithreading and with ‘Vega 8’ graphics. Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G: The Ryzen 2000 Series In this review we focus on the Ryzen 5 2400G, but also test the Ryzen 3 2200G. The new APUs now set the bar even higher. AMD has historically been aggressive in the low-end desktop space, effectively killing the sub-$100 discrete graphics market. Today is the launch of the desktop socket edition APUs, with four Zen cores and up to 11 Vega compute units. After a return to high performance on x86 with the Ryzen CPU product line, and the 'we can't produce enough' Vega graphics, AMD has inserted several product lines that combine the two. AMD's new launch of APUs hits the apex of the 2017 designs that tend the balance sheet black.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |